top of page

NHS Rankings: How Protects Plus Supports You When You Need It

  • Lindsey Reynolds
  • Sep 16
  • 3 min read

The first NHS trust ranking league has been published following the announcement by the Secretary of State of its introduction, back in November last year.

While essentially, the rankings are intended to measure performance, compare trusts and drive improvement, the danger of unintended consequences hovers ominously.

Take as deep a dive as you want, the main takeaway is that your trust will be ranked from 1 for 4 with 1 being best (high-performance) and 4 the worst (low-performance).

Unless you’re in segment 1, you will be expected to improve your ranking.

Being ranked 3 or 4 is bad news for the trusts concerned. Segment 3 can be summed up as ‘needs fixing’ and 4 as ‘in crisis’ (see below for our interpretation of what each segment means).

Either is likely to pile yet more pressure onto staff at all levels, and we need to recognise that behind the numbers are real teams, real patients, and real constraints.

Lower rankings aren’t simply about “poor performance” — they reflect complex realities: stretched workforces, financial pressures, regulatory compliance burdens, and system-wide inequalities.

Here at Protects Plus, we recognise the weight of this scrutiny and the commitment of those working tirelessly in these environments.

That’s why we’re committed to:

✅ Listening first — understanding each Trust’s unique challenges

✅Supporting compliance and governance so organisations aren’t penalised unnecessarily

✅ Strengthening operational resilience through targeted support where it matters most

✅ Helping teams evidence improvements so their hard work translates into better scores —

and better outcomes for patients.

We don’t just see league table positions. We see partners who deserve support, recognition, and practical everyday solutions.

So if you’re facing these challenges, we’d love to connect and explore how we can help and support you through these times.

Simply click the button below to book your free, no-obligation call with us.





 

Segment Summary


Segment 1 – High Performing


What it means:

  • The trust is consistently delivering across all key metrics (performance, quality, workforce, finance).

  • No significant compliance or governance concerns.

  • Usually CQC-rated Good or Outstanding.

  • These trusts get a light-touch oversight regime — NHS England monitors but does not intervene much.


Typical profile: Stable leadership, financial balance, strong quality/safety record, innovation in service delivery.

 

Segment 2 – Targeted Support


What it means:

  • Generally good performance, but with emerging risks in one or two domains (e.g., workforce pressures, finance slipping, slower progress on inequalities).

  • They may need targeted NHS England support to stay on track.


Typical profile: Trust is safe and effective, but has pinch points (maybe waiting times rising, or financial plans slightly off course).

 

Segment 3 – Enhanced Oversight


What it means:

  • Trust is underperforming in several areas e.g., long waits, safety concerns, workforce turnover, or recurrent deficits.

  • Compliance issues (CQC requires improvement, weak governance) are common.

  • NHS England requires frequent assurance meetings and hands-on improvement support.


Typical profile: Large or persistent backlogs, poor patient flow, workforce gaps, often reliant on temporary staff, recurring financial pressures.

 

Segment 4 – Intensive Support


What it means:

  • Trust is failing in multiple domains and may pose a significant risk to patient safety or financial stability.

  • Often includes trusts in special measures or those with enforcement actions (CQC inadequate).

  • NHS England steps in with intensive support and sometimes direct intervention (e.g., leadership changes, financial recovery plans, mandated improvement programmes).


Typical profile: Serious quality failings, large-scale governance breakdowns, or sustained financial crisis.

 

Segment 5 (rare, optional)


  • Used only for trusts requiring the most intensive national intervention.

  • Not always applied, but is essentially “worst case” — akin to “special measures plus.”

Related News


Comments


Commenting on this post isn't available anymore. Contact the site owner for more info.
bottom of page